San Diego’s crypto-friendly Silvergate Bank has disclosed that its financial health has taken a turn for the worse amid continued troubles plaguing the digital currency industry — raising questions about its ability to remain a going concern.
Silvergate, which tailored its business toward providing deposit accounts, fund transfers, a real-time payments network and other banking infrastructure to the cryptocurrency industry, revealed that it has suffered additional losses in January and February from sales of debt securities that backstopped its crypto-related deposits.
This story is for subscribers
We offer subscribers exclusive access to our best journalism.
Thank you for your support.
Those losses will put pressure on the FDIC-insured bank’s regulatory capital reserves and “could result in the company and the bank being less than well-capitalized,” said Silvergate in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday.
Under these conditions, Silvergate said it is evaluating “the impact that these subsequent events have on its ability to continue as a going concern for the twelve months following the issuance of its financial statements.”
Silvergate said that it likely would be unable to file its annual report with the SEC by the March 16 deadline as it works to answer questions related to regulatory and other “inquiries and investigations.”
The bank’s independent accounting firm also needs more time to complete certain audit steps before filing the annual report, a Silvergate spokesman said in an email to the U-T on Thursday.
The disclosures sent the bank’s already beat-down shares tumbling 55 percent to $6.04 in midday trading on the New York Stock Exchange. The stock is down from a high of $158 per share about a year ago during the crypto boom.
“It confirms the fears that many regulators have had,” said Todd Baker, a senior fellow at Columbia University’s Richman Center for Business, Law and Public Policy, in an interview with Bloomberg News. “If this bank fails, it’s going to be held up as an example of why banks should be extremely conservative in dealing with crypto companies.”
Silvergate has been under increasing pressure amid a handful of high-profile bankruptcies in the crypto industry — punctuated by the collapse of FTX and criminal fraud charges against founder Sam Bankman-Fried.
Both FTX and its sister firm Alameda Research had accounts at Silvergate. A group of U.S. senators led by Elizabeth Warren are probing why Silvergate’s anti-money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act compliance programs failed to red flag improper transfers between FTX and Alameda.
Following FTX’s collapse in November, Silvergate saw a run on its deposits, which dropped from $11.9 billion to $3.8 billion in the fourth quarter.
The bank lost $1 billion in the fourth quarter because it was forced to sell debt securities intended to be held to maturity earlier than planned to cover deposit withdrawals. It also laid off 181 workers in San Diego to trim expenses — including its chief credit officer and chief anti-money laundering and sanctions officer.
At year-end, Silvergate held short-term cash or equivalents of $4.6 billion, which exceeds the $3.8 billion in deposits remaining from crypto customers, according to the bank.
A large part of that cash came from $4.3 billion in short-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. In Wednesday’s SEC filing, Silvergate said it had sold off additional investment securities to repay the FHLB loans in full.
At the end of the fourth quarter, Silvergate had debt securities valued at $5.6 billion available for sale. The value of that portfolio today is unclear. The bank could face valuation impairments to the portfolio in addition to the losses from earlier-than-expected sales to repay the FHLB.
This is story is developing. Check back for updates.